Skip to content
ReelSpace

Tetris Wouldn't Triumph at This Gaming Ceremony — Another Award Type Could Fix That

As any significant awards ceremony nears, there’s always a demand for the addition of new categories to acknowledge overlooked contributions and satisfy the passions of fans dedicated to specific genres.

A fellow writer has already made for a horror game category. That would rule. The same goes for board games, this being someone's personal cause. But they will have to forgive me for pushing forward because like all blinkered fanatics, there's a strong justification backing this proposal stands as crucial and significant. The demand is this: There should be a category for puzzle games.

Organizing Gaming Categories

Categorizing art by genre isn't exact; it remains highly personal, and typically start arguments concluding with vague boundaries. This explains why film award organizations steer clear of genre categories. But it is a necessary evil in the world of interactive entertainment, showing incredible range they barely qualify one unified medium.

For comprehensive acknowledgment of interactive entertainment excellence to receive acknowledgment, and to ensure all game types to compete fairly, specific award classifications remain vital.

Present Award Structure

Leading game ceremonies presently include classifications covering Action, Adventure-action titles, RPG experiences, Fighting, Simulation and strategy titles, plus athletic and racing experiences. Between them, these award types actually cover many game types, and you can find room accommodating various experiences.

This doesn't apply to puzzle games. There’s simply nowhere for their placement. Examine these examples from recent excellent titles, all very different: building puzzles of one title, the pulse-pounding block-matching of another game, engaging interpersonal challenges in another game. What category would fit them between these six categories? Nowhere, that’s where.

Recognition Challenges

There are dozens outstanding logic titles published annually lacking appropriate categories during gaming ceremonies, except when they manage to fit award groups including Handheld titles, Virtual reality experiences, and the highly challenging Indie races.

  • A renowned logic title wasn’t nominated completely during that awards season
  • Another imaginative release received no nominations that year
  • Well-received sorting experience was overlooked that year
  • Only a few logic titles barely qualified for small studio or handheld classifications

Importance of Logic Titles

Commonly they're small games, yet the craft behind logic titles holds tremendous importance. Well-known matching games rank among the most-played games globally and have been for over a decade.

The iconic tile-matching title challenges famous sandbox experiences for the title of most purchased experience; it also contends as greatest title ever. Logic titles represent cornerstones for gaming as medium, and engaging with almost every other genre.

The Solution and Justification

Puzzle games wouldn’t have that issue. One could readily select a field of five interesting, varied, worthy titles each ceremony simply — or rather, with difficulty, given the need to exclude numerous deserving experiences.

And to reiterate, these represent titles without proper classification during prominent ceremonies. Logic title developers operate at the demanding boundary game development, creating some of most fundamental forms within interactive entertainment. Similar to cinema stunt performers, they warrant appreciation. We shouldn't delay decades.

AW
The writer

Alicia Wilson

Alex is a seasoned film critic and entertainment journalist with a passion for uncovering cinematic gems.

ReelSpace

Type to search articles.